| Author |
Message |
div
|
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Jun 13, 2005 - 03:23 PM
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 352
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
Well, OJ is inocent. (opps Jacko) Kinda what I thought, but I was sure he would get something guilty. Just for punishment for being strainge. Oh, well, it's over, thats what I care about. No more Jacko 24/7.
Div' |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Insex
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 12, 2005 - 01:00 AM
|
|
Addict
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
Posts: 240
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
| I share the same view. It seems that if you're a celebrity in California, then the law doesn't apply to you. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
div
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 11, 2005 - 12:00 AM
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 352
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
My guess is that he will get inocent on all but guilty on the serving or giving alcohol to a minor. Just kind of a gut feeling after listening to the pundits argue on the news.
Div' |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Insex
|
|
|
Post subject: Jack-O
Posted: Mar 13, 2005 - 10:23 PM
|
|
Addict
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
Posts: 240
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
| What does everyone think about this Michael Jackson molestation case? Guilty or innocent? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Quake3addicts.com
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
